From what I understood from this reading is that the
farmers that are producing the food for everyone cannot afford to feed themselves
and their families. I would assume that having farmers that cannot afford to
feed their own families would then cause them to go looking for other jobs and
selling their own land so they can hopefully find better pay to support their
families. I would then think that much like in our area the buyers of that land
would build warehouses on the land. Also, the farmers would no longer be
producing food and the more and more farmers that leave the trade to support their
families will cause less and less food being produce which would then in turn cause
the need for more food to be imported which in turn would rise food prices. I
would also think that corporations would not want to lose their farmers because
it is not more expensive to import food. I do not understand the logic of
underpaying the farmers because to me they would lose more money in the long
run than if they just paid them fairly. I feel as though if those that are
producing the food are suffering then eventually everyone will begin to feel
the effects of their suffering. Causing everyone's food security to be put at risk.
1 comment:
Sometimes I think paying farmworkers is not just about greedy managers or evil intentions. I made less as a farmworker than I could have at Walmart. The CSA I worked for barely eeked out a profit, and the main farmer was also making an unfair wage for all the work he put in. However, this is partly because the organic farm was a non-profit, so maybe that is a factor...
Post a Comment